Why do climate activists think it is okay to block the hope of countries like Senegal where over 40% of the population live below poverty? Where’s the economic solution instead of just the cost?

BY John Walker

It’s no secret that a lot of those pushing the unproven hypothesis that human emissions of CO2 are leading to catastrophic global warming are also pushing for depopulation. Paul Ehrlich is a prime example.

And most of the population growth is occurring in third world nations like Senegal. While most of the native populations in industrialized Western countries are decreasing, Senegal’s is increasing nearly 3 % per annum.

Senegal Population 1950-2021

Chart and table of Senegal population from 1950 to 2021. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/SEN/senegal/population

Thus, many climate alarmists who are pushing the unproven hypothesis of catastrophic AGW are also interested in reducing the population growth of such countries. Limiting the amount of abundant cheap energy is one of the best ways to do that without actively killing citizens. Pandemics and wars are also good ways.

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” –Paul Ehrlich

“The mother of the year should be a sterilized woman with two adopted children.” – Paul Ehrlich

“People have not made the connection that the more of us there are, the more greenhouse gases go into the atmosphere. The Chinese have. They, unlike us, have a population policy.” – Paul Ehrlich, CAGW alarmist and de-population activist, author of The Population Bomb [Of course, China pollutes and produces more “greenhouse gases than any other nation on Earth, but that fact seems to have escaped Ehrlich!]

“According to OPA expert Ferguson, [Henry] Kissinger initiated a full about-face on U.S. development policy toward the Third World. ‘For a long time,’ Ferguson stated, ‘people here were timid. They listened to arguments from Third World leaders that said that the best contraceptive was economic reform and development. So we pushed development programs, and we helped create a population time bomb. We are letting people breed like flies without allowing for natural causes to keep population down. We raised the birth survival rates, extended life-spans by lowering death rates, and did nothing about lowering birth rates. That policy is finished. We are saying with Global 2000 and in real policy that you must lower population rates. Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective– then you can have some development.’

“Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nations access to nuclear energy technology–the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population.” http://home.iae.nl/users/lightne…[Quotes_of_the_Imperium] Kissinger’s Population Control Agenda in Action

These globalists are using fake climate alarm to get their globalist agendas passed by creating so much fear in the populace that they will be willing to do whatever the globalists’ demand, even replacing free-market capitalism and democracy with authoritarian socialism based upon the Chinese model of a few elitist oligarchs ruling over the serfs.

More here

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-climate-activists-think-it-is-okay-to-block-the-hope-of-countries-like-Senegal-where-over-40-of-the-population-live-below-poverty-Where-s-the-economic-solution-instead-of-just-the-cost/answer/John-Walker-922/log

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.